The Plant Pot Paradox

Posted: 18/02/2025

The Plant Pot Paradox

Whilst plant pots are perhaps quite a niche area of plastics manufacturing, hundreds of millions each year find their way into households, and subsequently into the waste and recycling streams.

Generally, plant pots are made of polypropylene and until a few years ago they were predominately black from a carbon-based pigment. This made them undetectable by sorting equipment and therefore unsuitable for kerbside recycling. The war on plastic that erupted in 2018 made many major growers (and the retailers they supplied) question how a “green” industry could be responsible for sending so much plastic to landfill, and more or less overnight growers decided they wanted “kerbside recyclable” pots.

Manufacturers that didn’t already have suitable options moved rapidly to introduce detectable colours and growers, especially those supplying garden centres and the multiples, were quick to adopt the recyclable options. This involved a lot of experimentation and testing (and cost) but now virtually all plants grown for the retail market in the UK are produced in detectable pots with grey and taupe as the predominant colours.

Despite the challenges this seems like a fantastic example of the supply chain adapting to improve recyclability, but……
In 2018 a survey of local authorities by horticultural trade magazine Hort Week found that a huge 87% of those that responded would not accept plant pots in any form.

Given the extra cost of the detectable pots this was a contentious issue with growers who felt they were just paying more for a product with the same recycling outcome as before. Growers, manufactures, the main industry body the HTA (Horticultural Trades Association) and RECOUP lobbied government, recyclers and local authorities to promote the move to detectable pots. WRAP changed their guidance to state “non-black plant pots should be included in collections” and OPRL deemed pots suitable to carry the “widely recycled” logo as it was at the time and subsequently “recycle”. Finally, after a long campaign it was announced by DEFRA in the latter part of last year that (detectable PP) plant pots would be included in collections under the simpler recycling scheme.

So the sector had that happy ending after all? Actually, no. A repeat survey by Hort Week at the end of August 2024 found only 8% of authorities that responded now accept plant pots, a 5% shift in the wrong direction!

Even more frustrating is the fact that many councils also stated to Hort Week that they have no plans to follow DEFRA’s directive any time soon. Many of the reasonings given such as “Plastic plant pots are difficult to recycle due to the type of plastic from which they are made” and “Most councils unfortunately don’t accept plant pots for kerbside recycling (and as far as we understand are unlikely to in the immediate future) because they are made from a type of plastic that is not currently accepted at sorting facilities” were very misguided and quite alarming.

While neatly falling into the “pots, tubs and trays” category for recycling, it seems the suffix “plant” creates an irrational fear causing most local authorities to specifically state plant pots cannot be included in kerbside collections. This seemingly with no real logical or consistent reasoning. If we switch off the punch that makes the drainage holes in the plant pot and print “yoghurt” on the side instead of geranium, the same “pot” suddenly becomes recyclable!

Alongside all this there has also been a constant pressure on growers from major retailers and groups to find “green” alternatives to plastic pots. This is perhaps driven by the desire to appease consumers and NGOs who have been brainwashed into to thinking anything that is plastic must be bad, and that any alternative must be better. The fact that most pots whether kerbside recyclable or not currently still end up in residual waste as local authorities can’t or won’t recycle only adds to this pressure.

(As an aside this is not to say alternative materials should be ignored, we constantly evaluate other options, and there may indeed be certain specific scenarios where they may have a role.)

When looking at material options it is important to look at the whole picture. Often the focus seems to be on end of life, maybe because it is the bit the consumer sees, but we should not overlook the environmental impact of manufacturing the raw material and subsequent processing.
Effects on shelf life and wastage also needs to be considered, as in most cases the environmental footprint of growing a plant and delivering it through the supply chain will be a far greater than the pot itself.

Also it is generally accepted that a move to a circular economy is far better than linear material flows which many of the alternatives to plastic pots can be. The easy recyclability of detectable polypropylene plant pots is what should make them a sustainable choice.


We need to let all those pots (and it amounts to many tens of thousands of tonnes) to have their second (and third and fourth …) life and allow them to be truly circular.

Lets hope that those local authorities that have no idea what a plant pot is made of and how easy they are to recycle will take note and get their recycling mojo on so that all that lovely polypropylene can finally be captured and used many more times.

Just as a foot note, perhaps we should also mention re-use. There are certainly areas of plant production where this may, with adaptions, be viable particularly for some of the grower’s internal processes but we are still a long way from a plant pot DRS. Or are we?

 

 

Opinions expressed by external contributors may not reflect RECOUP positions. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the contents of this publication, RECOUP cannot accept responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions.

Sustainability – A Seasonal Ponder

Posted: 03/01/2025

Sustainability – A Seasonal Ponder

Sustainability in our societies isn’t simple, it’s messy and complex and interconnected and hard. It’s like trying to herd cats while juggling a bowling ball, a watermelon, and a live hamster. It’s enough to make your head spin faster than budgets. And what the word means to who and when, is also perspective driven and situational!

But if we have an open discussion, can we then see and deliver some genuine opportunities for change? For those that have met me, talked with me and argued with me personally and professionally about sustainability, I always want to explore ways to engage people, so, sitting comfortably? Then let’s begin! Seriously though, this sustainability thing is no joke. It’s like a choose-your-own-adventure book where every path leads to a ‘more’ dystopian future. Materials, recycling, energy, water, food – it’s a veritable Venn diagram of doom. And don’t even get me started on the social justice angle.

Christmas brings 30% more waste than the rest of the year:
Waste: The UK throws away 13,350 tonnes of glass, 114,000 tonnes of plastic packaging, and over 160,000 tonnes of Christmas trees.
Carbon emissions: Christmas Eve, Christmas Day, and Boxing Day account for almost 6% of the UK’s annual carbon
emissions. Cooking turkeys alone generates 14,056 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide.
Toys: By March, 41% of toys bought at Christmas will be broken and sent to landfills.
Cards: Only 1 in 4 Christmas cards gets recycled.
Paper: 50,000 trees are cut down each year to make enough

Firstly, there’s nothing remotely amusing about a range of topics concerning our world and societies disintegrating. When life gives you an impending environmental collapse, gather together and let the good times roll – opportunity awaits! Perhaps holding a debate, roundtable discussion or simple Q&A session can provide a learning opportunity (and some entertainment).

The problem is that anyone who’s ever delivered a talk or written an article about sustainability will agree on one thing – talking about it is really hard. And let’s be real, when was the last time anyone got excited about a pie chart? (Turkey or ham?) Getting people engaged and interested in something that could potentially change the future of many species is not easy. Especially if you need to discuss some facts with younger audiences who haven’t caused these issues, and yet they are destined to deal with them in their lifetime.

There could be many reasons people don’t engage with sustainability, but for many it has been a very abstract problem. But the world has and is changing, from the horse to the infernal combustion engine; the letter to the smartphone of our 24hr connected world, and then there’s the seasons! Often people will imagine sad-looking polar bears, litter and maybe an overheating planet. But these images don’t speak to personal experience for most, and therefore won’t inspire action. But here’s the thing – we are a special breed. We don’t just sit around and complain, we roll up our sleeves, put on our thinking caps, and get to work. So, let’s put on our best action hats and make sustainability the next big thing.

Firstly, enjoy the time
Take a breath, take some time, consider how you spend time with whom…for both your sakes.
Then consider…
– LED lights, use a timer…
– Do you need a Christmas tree?
– How about ecards, personal messages or plants & seeds?
– Consider memories or experiences not ‘things’
– What has been the ‘costs’ of your purchase?
– Consider gifts of time (or help), or handmade or baking

To capture people’s attention so far, the overwhelming majority of sustainability messaging is negative because, naturally, scientists are worried about the long-lasting and irreversible effects. Also, anything that poses a threat to human existence is considered ‘newsworthy’ by the mainstream media and has a catastrophic tone, which is problematic because, at the end of the day, the message of sustainability is louder than ever. From composting our leftover dinners to trading in our gas-guzzlers for electric bikes, we’re all finding ways to ‘save’ the planet. And as leaders in our community, maybe the opportunity is to help people better understand and take action…we can all make a difference.

If I have initiated thought, challenge and possibly action…for all our futures. So, come on, laugh, learn and make a few sustainable choices along the way. After all, what’s the point of saving the world if you can’t have a little fun doing it?

So…what conclusions have you reached or discussed to that?

Dr Geoff Mackey (trying to make sustainable choices as Santa)
PS How bad are bananas by Mike Berners-Lee
PPS Time to eat the dog by Robert & Brenda Vale

 

 

 

Opinions expressed by external contributors may not reflect RECOUP positions. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the contents of this publication, RECOUP cannot accept responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions.

Is the UK’s Drive to Reduce Virgin Plastic Use Genuine or Just Hot Air?

Posted: 09/08/2024

Is the UK’s Drive to Reduce Virgin Plastic Use Genuine or Just Hot Air?

In recent years, the buzz around reducing plastic waste has hit fever pitch. Everywhere you look, from TV ads to government press releases, there’s a loud and clear message: plastic is the enemy, and recycling is our saviour. But hold on a second—let’s hit pause and dig a bit deeper. Is there real intent in the UK to swap virgin plastic for recycled plastic, especially when governments continue to pour massive subsidies into fossil fuels? Or is it all just a load of hot air designed to make us feel warm and fuzzy inside?

 

The Plastic Predicament

First off, let’s get one thing straight: plastic is not inherently evil. It’s versatile, durable, and—let’s face it—pretty darn convenient. The problem arises from our over-reliance on virgin plastic, which is plastic made from raw fossil fuels. This process is not only resource-intensive but also leaves a hefty carbon footprint.
The UK government has been pretty vocal about its commitment to reducing plastic waste. Policies like the plastic packaging tax, which charges companies for using less than 30% recycled content in their packaging, seem to indicate a move in the right direction. But are these measures enough to outweigh the ongoing support for the fossil fuel industry?

 

Follow the Money: Fossil Fuel Subsidies

It’s hard to ignore the elephant in the room: fossil fuel subsidies. According to a report by the International Institute for Sustainable Development, the UK spends billions annually on fossil fuel subsidies. In 2021 alone, the figure was a staggering £10.5 billion. This financial support makes virgin plastic—derived from these subsidised fossil fuels—cheaper than its recycled counterpart. So, while the government is slapping companies on the wrist with one hand for not using recycled plastic, it’s effectively making virgin plastic more attractive with the other.

 

The Recycling Rhetoric

Recycling is hailed as the golden ticket to solving our plastic problem. And sure, it’s a vital part of the solution. But the infrastructure needs to change if it’s to be the silver bullet it’s portrayed to be. For starters, much of our recyclable plastic still ends up in landfills due to contamination or lack of recycling facilities. (It’s why we, at Convert Design, are working so hard to launch a unique plastic bottle reverse vending machine).

The reality is, recycled plastic is more expensive to produce than virgin plastic. The energy and processes involved in collecting, cleaning, and reprocessing plastic waste are costlier than simply creating new plastic. This economic disparity begs the question: if the government were genuinely committed to reducing virgin plastic use, wouldn’t it address the cost imbalance more aggressively?

 

Actions Speak Louder Than Words

The idea of a deposit return scheme (DRS) for bottles could incentivise recycling and reduce litter. However, the actual implementation of DRS in the UK has been a different story. Despite being successfully introduced across Europe and in the Republic of Ireland, the UK’s DRS has faced repeated postponements. The latest delay pushes the introduction in England, Northern Ireland, and Wales to at least 2027, while Scotland’s scheme has faced its own share of setbacks .

These delays are frustrating, especially when you consider how well DRS has worked elsewhere. Countries like Germany and Norway have seen impressive recycling rates and reductions in litter since introducing their schemes. Ireland’s system, launched in November 2022, has already shown positive results. So, what’s holding the UK back? These continual postponements suggest a lack of urgency and commitment, casting doubt on the government’s genuine intent to tackle plastic waste.

 

The Propaganda Problem

Public awareness has soared, and companies are increasingly keen to flaunt their green credentials. But how much of this is genuine, and how much is just good PR?

Many companies have jumped on the eco-bandwagon, boasting about their use of recycled – or recyclable – materials or their commitment to sustainability. But if you dig a little deeper, these claims often lack substance. Claiming a product is ‘recyclable’ when the reality is that there are no facilities to make that recycling a reality, is just plain “greenwashing”. It’s a superficial attempt to appear environmentally friendly without making significant changes.

 

A Call for Genuine Change

If the UK is serious about reducing its reliance on virgin plastic, it needs to put its money where its mouth is. This means re-evaluating fossil fuel subsidies and investing more heavily in plastic recycling infrastructure. It also means setting more ambitious targets for recycled content and holding companies accountable for meeting them.
Moreover, innovation should be encouraged. There are exciting developments in bioplastics and alternative materials that could help reduce our virgin plastic footprint. Supporting these innovations financially and legislatively could drive the market away from virgin plastics more effectively than any tax could.

 

Conclusion

So, is the UK’s intent to reduce virgin plastic use genuine? The jury’s still out. There are positive signs, but they’re often overshadowed by the ongoing support for fossil fuels and the economic realities of recycling infrastructue. For now, it seems we’re stuck in a cycle of rhetoric and half-measures.

To break this cycle, we need more than just propaganda and token gestures. We need comprehensive policies, substantial investment, and a genuine commitment to change. Only then can we hope to move towards a more sustainable future.

 

**Sources:**
1. International Institute for Sustainable Development. (2021). “Fossil Fuel Subsidies in the UK”. [IISD website](https://www.iisd.org).
2. UK Government. (2021). “Plastic Packaging Tax”. [gov.uk](https://www.gov.uk).
3. DEFRA. (2023). “Deposit Return Scheme for drinks containers in England, Northern Ireland, and Wales delayed until 2025”. Retrieved from [gov.uk](https://www.gov.uk).
4. Scottish Government. (2023). “Scotland’s Deposit Return Scheme faces further delays”. [gov.scot](https://www.gov.scot).

 

 

Opinions expressed by external contributors may not reflect RECOUP positions. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the contents of this publication, RECOUP cannot accept responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions.